Everybody has an opinion on Tom Crean, and every opinion seems to be strong and unwavering.

There’s one segment of the population — mostly optimistic Indiana fans and media members/former coaches — that believe, without a doubt, Crean should stay. The argument usually goes something like this:

What? Get rid of Crean? Are you nuts? He’s won the Big Ten title two of the last four years and made the Sweet 16 three times!

There’s another segment of the population — led by a frustrated portion of the Indiana fan base — that want the program to go in a different direction. They recognize what Crean has done for the program in his nine years, but believe he has reached his ceiling and want him to go.

This group’s argument usually sounds like this:

This will be the fifth time Indiana has missed the NCAA Tournament in nine years under Crean, and he’s never made it further than the Sweet 16. This is Indiana — we expect Final Fours and National Championships, not Sweet 16s.

You won’t find many people with a lukewarm opinion that fall somewhere in between the group that wants Crean gone today and the group that thinks he should stay no matter what. Does a rational middle ground exist?

I don’t think it does, and here’s why — Crean’s Indiana program has never offered a rational middle ground. This is something I heard my good friend Alex Bozich talking about on a national podcast with Sam Vecenie┬áthis week.

With the exception of his first three seasons when he was rebuilding the program after Kelvin Sampson‘s mistakes, Tom Crean’s Indiana has either greatly overachieved or underachieved expectations every season.

In 2011-12, the Hoosiers were the overachieving sweethearts, knocking off No. 1 Kentucky at home and marching to the Sweet 16 before falling to that same Kentucky team. Morale was high because your reaction is based on your expectations, and fans were hopeful for what was to come the next season. Overachieved.

In 2012-13, Indiana was ranked No. 1 in the preseason polls, so it was impossible to meet expectations unless the Hoosiers made a run to at least the Final Four and probably the title game. The Hoosiers had a good season, but they were upset by Syracuse in the Sweet 16, and the year at large was viewed as a giant opportunity missed. Morale was low because expectations were high. Underachieved.

In 2013-14, expectations weren’t as high, but Indiana brought in 5-star recruit Noah Vonleh, so the cupboard wasn’t bare. The Hoosiers were ranked 24th in the preseason Coaches Poll, but they limped to a 17-15 record and missed the NCAA Tournament. Underachieved.

Indiana brought in a stellar 2014 recruiting class that included James Blackmon Jr. and Robert Johnson, but it was another middle-of-the-road year for the Hoosiers, finishing 20-14 with a first-round exit vs. Wichita State. This was the one exception because Indiana didn’t grossly overachieve or underachieve, but the Hoosiers did fall short of expectations, and they failed to make it out of the first round for two straight seasons. Morale was low.

Last season, expectations were lowered significantly after Indiana’s dreadful performance at the Maui Invitational and at Duke in the Big Ten/ACC Challenge. The Hoosiers eventually righted the ship — something Crean deserves a lot of credit for — and Indiana’s run to the Sweet 16 and win over rival Kentucky greatly exceeded those lesser expectations. Overachieved.

This season, like Bozich mentioned on the podcast, is essentially the polar opposite. Expectations reached impossible levels after Indiana’s wins over Kansas and North Carolina, and Indiana has grossly underachieved those expectations.

In essence, it’s been a tumultuous run of either exceeding expectations when they’re relatively low and falling short of expectations when they’re impossibly high with no real middle ground to be had. It shouldn’t really come as a surprise, then, that fans and the media alike have formed opinions that fall on opposite sides with nothing in the middle.

Who’s right? Honestly, there’s truth in both sides. The facts are the facts, you just present them in a way that supports your side of the argument. That’s what everyone is doing right now. Here’s what I’ll say about this year’s Indiana team, as it relates to Tom Crean:

Crean has fallen short of holding players accountable, and it has hurt this group. Crean’s heart is in the right place, as it almost always is, but he should have sat James Blackmon Jr. down at some point this season and rolled with the other guys he’s got. Blackmon is a gifted and skilled scorer, but he’s selfish and puts himself before his teammates. There’s a reason why Indiana had so much success without him last season. Harsh, but true.

I see Blackmon being detrimental to the development of this team in a similar way that Hanner Mosquera-Perea was detrimental to the development of Yogi Ferrell and the rest of the team (minus the off-court incidents, of course). Mosquera-Perea cared about himself first, second and third, and he served as a negative influence on Indiana’s basketball culture. Crean wanted to help him succeed, but Mosquera-Perea never seemed interested. When Crean wasn’t as hard on Mosquera-Perea as he should have been, other guys noticed. When Mosquera-Perea was dismissed from the program, the culture started to change.

[Note: I also think that Ferrell’s development was aided by Blackmon’s absence last season.]

Blackmon is obviously a much better player than Mosquera-Perea and has never been in trouble off the court like Mosquera-Perea. I’m not suggesting he has. But Blackmon’s focus on himself and not the team has hurt the Indiana culture, and Crean’s failure to hold him accountable has hurt the development of Robert Johnson and the rest of the team. If one guy never plays defense, jacks up any shot he wants, etc. and never gets taken out for it, eventually you may start to fall into some bad habits yourself.

Crean called out Blackmon and Johnson on his postgame radio show after Indiana’s loss to Michigan on Feb. 12, but then started Blackmon and benched only Johnson in the next game at Minnesota. That sends the wrong message to Johnson and the rest of your team.

Recognize, though, that Crean is in a tough situation when it comes to Blackmon. Indiana was essentially Blackmon’s old girlfriend during the recruiting process, still there waiting for him at the end after Blackmon went and took some other girls for a test drive. So when Blackmon arrived on campus, he felt a certain amount of entitlement, and I’m not sure anybody’s ever going to be able to get that entitlement out of him. I don’t know if it’s even possible to change him.

But whether he’s Indiana’s best player or not, Crean should have benched him at some point this season and rolled with the guys who have truly bought into his program and his way of doing things. By allowing Blackmon to continue to play despite his ‘me-first’ attitude, Crean lost Johnson and probably some other guys along the way.

As a person close to the program told me recently: “It’s not that James can’t do it, he just doesn’t want to do it.”

[Keep in mind, too, that we saw what this beat up team looked like without Blackmon, and it wasn’t pretty. So it’s a very tough spot for Crean.]

Crean’s program depends on its stars to develop into true winners with a team-first mindset. When they do — like Ferrell — Indiana thrives. When they don’t — like Blackmon — Indiana struggles.

There is no middle ground.

  • I’m 58, everyone I know feels the same wayas me and most have quit watching. It’s unwatchable, low IQ, fundamentally unsound basketball. It not even fun when we are winning. I should be able to watch a game without seeing gross errors on almost every possession. Like all 5 players not blocking out. I’m getting chronically hoarse from yelling at the TV.

  • Matt

    This is an excellent, balanced article about why it is so hard to coach. As a coach, you want the best for your players, your team, and yourself as well. How do you balance all that? What if you sit Blackmon and his attitude worsens? What would you do without his scoring? Would the freshman guards develop in his absence? Thanks for the great article helping us see all the sides!

    • Randall Smith

      You sit him anyway! And if it makes him worse…continue to set him or show him the door! He is cancer to this team. And I for one have been saying the same thing since he’s put on the stripes! JBJ has no place in this system! Would have been perfect for UK! At least I would have respected Crean for nutting up and taking the principles rout! He’s the poster child for letting H.S. kids go straight to the NBA and not wasting scholarships, but that’s a whole other debate!

      • SK

        Could not agree more!

  • Carl

    there are really not two sides to the Crean debate. By far a majority of fans are frustrated with him and want him to go. I would say 70-80% of Indiana fans feel this way. Unwatchable, underachieving, selfish, no fundamentals, sloppy basketball is what Crean has brought to us. But your right we have won 2 Big Ten Titles in 9 years….

  • My eyes hurt

    I hate myself for reading this garbage about Blackmon. The guy’s come back from yet another knee injury. The team was horrifically bad without him. RJ proved incapable of carrying the load on his own and neither Green nor Jones stepped up.

    What I find most ironic is that no one was complaining about JBJ’s “me-first attitude” against Kansas, MSU or Penn State. When sitting on the bench, either healthy or injured, he’s up and cheering for his teammates. This view form 30,000 feet needs to be backed up by more than just an intuition and a shitty comparison to Hanner.

    Congrats. You’ve successfully jumped aboard Dakich’s weak narrative.

    • Randall Smith

      Your Bball IQ is beyond very low! If you couldn’t spot the cancer on this team you’re blind! Personal stats is the only thing he cares about! I have zero tolerance for a me player! Every time he hit the floor, you knew what was going to happen, and so did his teammates! And they didn’t appreciate it! Will not miss JBJ, not even a little!

      • My eyes hurt more

        Exclamation points really help make your opinion more valid. Try harder next time.

  • Ken Watterson

    Iowa had three men trapping the IU ball handler and swarming all over him, leaving only two players to defend against IU’s other four men yet IU still couldn’t find an open man. Crean seems to have no answer against tough defenses. I see Crean as a mediocre coach who will continue to win enough to avoid being fired but will never get IU back on top. Also, there’s more to recruiting than just going after the 4 or 5 star AAU kids. I’d like to see IU look more like an Indiana team by going after the best three or four high school players from Indiana every year and getting them.

  • LB

    Crean has to go! He’s lost the fan base and there’s no getting that back. He helped get IU out of the cellar but like the above person stated, he’s clearly getting out coached night in and out when he has better talent than the team he’s playing. I’ve stuck up for CTC the last few years but I’m so over it. Like 99% of the fan base I’m ready to move on.

  • Tony

    Thank you, Justin Albert, for saying what the diehard IU fans have been saying for so long!

    Your insights go beyond what’s politically correct, and in so doing, delve into what’s true. Blackmon is a selfish POS, and Crean babies him like no other. Blackmon could $hit on McCracken Court, and Crean would find an excuse.

    You know it. I know it. We all know it.

    We need a coach who commands respect. No Tony Bennett nonsense, because we don’t have time for “a little better.” We need THE BEST, and THE BEST is overdue.

    Get Brad Stevens, or I’m out as an IU fan. No more “almosts” or “good enoughs.”

    • Thank you for the comment … it’s Albers, though, for what it’s worth. Lol but thanks for reading.

    • Cameron seidenfaden

      Let me start off by saying I’m not an iu fan. But I watch and know basketball. Yes it’s time for both parties to move on. Iu needs a top ten coach. Not many out there that will leave their homestead for iu tho. Crean needs a fresh start. And Mark my words I bet crean will thrive at his next job. Reason being is he will learn from these last nine years. He has to command defense first. Iu plays absolutely no defense. That’s coaching for sure but also on the kids. Get rid of crean! Go after whoever you want. Brad Stevens would be perfect but not gonna happen. He’s thriving at Boston! And only getting better. Tony Bennett is a hell of a coach. Defensive minded hard nosed. Coaches against the best competition day in and day out. And is killing it at Virginia the last couple years. Also note Bennett is doing this with lack of one and dones and all Americans. I like Bennett because he reminds me of pitino. Who is my coach!!! Die hard cardinal right here! Lol
      Go your separate ways and move on. I will always say Steve Alford is the guy for indiana!! Go give him whatever he wants. Thanks for letting me write.
      Sincerely, a basketball fan who loves his home state. Even tho I’m not an iu fan. I will root for them to be good always

  • Derek

    I really am in the middle ground. I don’t want Crean to be let go unless we have somebody special in line that brings Crean’s “it’s Indiana” attitude. God I wish the Celtics weren’t trending up but because they are, who else would we get?

  • Talking about turmoil,let’s not forget all the years when players were transferring for bad behavior or because they were players who should have never been recruited to this high level. Every summer I was wondering who was going to leave.
    Then we would hear,”We are a very young team”. We have heard that excuse more years than not.

  • coachv

    love reading these albert justice columns as he usually hits the nail on the head.

    as for stevens, glass has to ask. of course he’s doing a great job with the celtics. but home is where the heart is. i don’t understand people thinking there is no chance he would like to come home. his family is here. he grew up attending iu games with his pops. iu could be his dream job. he has, and will continue to earn, more money than he could ever spend. more than 100 million. why assume coaching boston in the nba is the pinnacle for him. think alford would turn down indiana? hells no. roy williams was doing a fair job at kansas and he went home.

    just saying glass needs to ask brad to come home. worst he can say is no.